AI automation services pricing: Why licensing by workflow beats per-user fees

Choosing the right pricing model for AI automation services can make or break your automation strategy. While most companies focus on features and capabilities, the pricing structure you choose determines whether your automation scales profitably or becomes a budget nightmare.

The challenge? Traditional software pricing models weren't designed for automation. They were built for tools that require human work. But when AI handles repetitive tasks, processes client interactions, and manages workflows autonomously, charging per human user makes about as much sense as charging per lightbulb in your office.

Let's break down why workflow-based pricing is changing the game for businesses serious about automation.

Key takeaways

1. Three main pricing models exist for AI automation: project-based, per-user (seat-based), and per-workflow (AaaS)
2. Seat-based pricing creates financial barriers to client-facing automation by charging for every external user
3. Per-workflow pricing aligns costs with actual business value rather than arbitrary user counts
4. Moxo's workspace-based model enables unlimited client interactions without scaling costs
5. The right pricing model can transform automation from a cost center into a growth driver

‍

The three main pricing models for AI automation services

When you're shopping for AI automation services, you'll encounter three dominant pricing approaches. Each has distinct advantages and serious limitations depending on how you plan to use the technology.

1. Project-based pricing

Project-based pricing is the traditional consulting model applied to automation. You pay a fixed fee for a specific automation project or scope of work.

How it works:

• One-time implementation fee for building specific automations
• Clear deliverables and timeline
• Additional fees for modifications or new workflows
• Often includes some ongoing support or maintenance contract

Best for: Companies with well-defined, stable processes that don't need frequent updates. If you're automating a single high-value workflow that won't change much, project-based pricing offers predictability.

The limitation: This model discourages iteration. Every new automation or modification becomes a negotiation. As your business evolves, you're constantly going back to vendors for quotes, which slows down your ability to adapt.

2. Per-user (seat-based) pricing

This is the SaaS industry's default. You pay a monthly or annual fee for each user who accesses the platform. It's familiar, easy to understand, and absolutely terrible for automation at scale.

How it works:

• Monthly subscription multiplied by number of users
• Often tiered (basic users vs. admin users)
• Additional costs for external collaborators or clients
• Scales linearly with team size

Best for: Internal tools that require a fixed team of employees to have access. Think project management software or internal communication tools.

The fatal flaw: Seat-based pricing actively punishes you for doing what automation is supposed to enable, which is serving more customers without adding headcount. We'll dig deeper into this problem in the next section.

3. Per-workflow (automation as a service)

Workflow-based pricing charges you based on the automations you deploy or the workflows you activate, not the number of people using them. This model aligns costs with the actual business value you're getting.

How it works:

1. Pay for active workflows or automation sequences
2. Pricing tied to workflow complexity or volume
3. Unlimited users interacting with each workflow
4. Scales with business processes, not headcount

Best for: Businesses scaling client interactions, customer service, or any external-facing processes. Companies that want automation to drive growth, not just cut costs.

The advantage: Your costs scale with the value you're creating (more automated processes) rather than an arbitrary metric like user count. You can serve 100 clients or 10,000 clients through the same workflow without your software bill exploding.

‍

Why seat-based models punish client-facing automation

Here's where traditional per-user pricing completely breaks down for modern automation needs. The whole point of AI automation is to handle tasks that would otherwise require human intervention. But seat-based pricing forces you to pay for every person or client who touches your automated system.

Let's walk through a real-world scenario. Imagine you're a financial services firm that wants to automate client onboarding. Your workflow collects documents, verifies information, schedules meetings, and sends status updates. Beautiful, right? This could save your team hundreds of hours.

But with seat-based pricing, here's what happens:

1. You pay for each internal team member who manages the workflow (reasonable)
2. You pay for each client who accesses their onboarding portal (not reasonable)
3. You want to onboard 500 new clients this quarter? That's 500 new "seats" you're paying for
4. Many platforms charge $15-50 per external user per month

Suddenly, your automation project that was supposed to save money is costing you thousands per month in licensing fees. The more successful your client acquisition efforts are, the higher your software costs will be. You've accidentally created a system where growth is penalized.

This problem gets even worse with customer service automation. According to Gartner research, companies are increasingly using AI to handle routine customer inquiries. But if you're paying per customer seat, you're economically discouraged from giving customers direct access to automated workflows.

The result? Companies either:

1. Limit automation to internal processes only (missing huge opportunities)
2. Build clunky workarounds to minimize external users (terrible user experience)
3. Pay exorbitant licensing fees that eliminate the ROI of automation

None of these outcomes makes sense. The pricing model is actively fighting against a good automation strategy.

‍

How workflow-based pricing enables true scalability

Workflow-based pricing flips the script entirely. Instead of paying for people, you pay for processes. This seemingly simple change has profound implications for how you can use automation.

With per-workflow pricing, that same client onboarding automation becomes economically viable:

1. You pay a fixed fee for the onboarding workflow itself
2. 50 clients can use it, or 5,000 clients can use it at the same cost
3. Your automation costs are predictable and tied to business value
4. Growth actually improves your ROI because you're spreading the workflow cost across more interactions

This pricing structure enables use cases that are economically impossible with seat-based models. Customer self-service portals, client collaboration workspaces, and vendor management systems all of these become not just feasible but profitable.

According to McKinsey research, businesses that successfully implement customer-facing automation see 20-30% improvements in customer satisfaction alongside cost reductions. But you can't realize those gains if your pricing model makes customer-facing automation prohibitively expensive.

‍

The Moxo approach: Workspace-based pricing that scales

Moxo has taken workflow-based pricing to its logical conclusion with workspace-based licensing. Instead of charging per user or even per individual workflow, Moxo charges based on workspaces, which are containers for entire client journeys or business processes.

Here's how it works in practice. A workspace might contain multiple workflows for a single client relationship: onboarding, ongoing service delivery, document collection, communication threads, and approval processes. All of this happens within one workspace, and you pay for the workspace, not for each person using it.

The implications are significant:

• Unlimited client users: Your clients, their team members, and external stakeholders can all participate without additional fees
• Predictable costs: You know exactly what each client relationship or service delivery costs from a platform perspective
• Encourages comprehensive automation: Since you're not penalized for adding users, you can build complete end-to-end automated experiences
• Better client experience: No need to limit access or create workarounds. Give everyone the access they need

Companies using Moxo report being able to serve significantly higher client volumes without proportional increases in either headcount or software costs. Users on G2 reviews frequently highlight how helpful the platform has been for them.

As shared by a G2 reviewer, “Moxo was so helpful in assisting with the development of a private label platform for client management. Moxo is easy to use, and for over two years, I used this platform every day to manage my client flows.”

For professional services firms, this model is transformative. A law firm can create client workspaces for case management, a financial advisor can set up workspaces for each client portfolio, or a healthcare provider can build patient journey workspaces. In each case, costs are tied to the number of client relationships being managed, not the number of interactions or users.

‍

Making the right choice for your business

So which pricing model should you choose? It depends on your automation strategy and growth plans.

Choose project-based pricing if:

1. You have one or two specific, stable processes to automate
2. Your workflows won't need frequent updates
3. You prefer CapEx over OpEx for budgeting

Choose per-user pricing if:

1. Your automation is purely internal with a fixed team size
2. You're not planning to scale client interactions
3. The tool is primarily for human collaboration, not automation

Choose per-workflow or workspace pricing if:

1. You're automating client-facing processes
2. You plan to scale customer interactions without scaling headcount
3. You want predictable costs that align with business value
4. You're serious about comprehensive automation across the customer journey

‍

The right pricing model doesn't just affect your budget; it also affects your business. It shapes what's possible with automation. Seat-based pricing creates artificial constraints that force you to choose between automation and customer access. Workflow-based pricing removes those constraints and lets you build the automated experiences your business actually needs.

‍

The future of automation pricing

As AI automation becomes more sophisticated, we're likely to see pricing models continue to evolve. Some vendors are experimenting with outcome-based pricing, where you pay for results delivered rather than for workflows deployed. Others are exploring hybrid models that combine elements of different approaches.

But the fundamental principle remains: the best pricing model aligns vendor success with customer success. When your costs scale with value rather than arbitrary metrics, everyone wins.

For now, if you're building client-facing automation or planning to scale customer interactions, scrutinize the pricing model as carefully as you evaluate features. A platform with slightly fewer bells and whistles but workflow-based pricing will often deliver better ROI than a feature-rich tool that charges per seat.

Discover how Moxo's workspace-based pricing enables unlimited client collaboration and automation without per-user fees. Transform your client experience while maintaining predictable costs.

Schedule a Demo to see workspace-based pricing in action.

‍

FAQs

What is the difference between per-user and per-workflow pricing?

Per-user pricing charges you for each person who accesses the platform, while per-workflow pricing charges based on the number of automated processes you deploy. Per-workflow pricing allows unlimited users to interact with each workflow, making it ideal for client-facing automation.

Why is seat-based pricing bad for client-facing automation?

Seat-based pricing becomes expensive when many external users (clients or customers) access your automated workflows. Since you pay for each user, your costs increase with customer growth, which defeats the purpose of automation and creates a financial disincentive to scale.

How does Moxo's workspace pricing work?

Moxo charges based on workspaces rather than individual users or workflows. Each workspace can contain multiple workflows and support unlimited users, including clients and external stakeholders. This means you pay for the business process or client relationship, not for each person involved.

Is project-based pricing ever a good choice for automation?

Yes, project-based pricing works well for stable, well-defined processes that won't need frequent updates. If you're automating one or two specific workflows that are unlikely to change, project-based pricing offers predictability. However, it can slow down iteration and adaptation as your business evolves.

How can I calculate the ROI of different pricing models?

Compare the total cost over 12-24 months under each model based on your projected growth. For seat-based pricing, multiply your expected user count by the per-seat fee. For workflow pricing, multiply the number of workflows by their cost. Factor in how many client interactions you expect to scale. Workflow-based models typically show better ROI as you grow.

‍