Moxo vs. Microsoft Power Automate : Choosing the best workflow tool for client handoffs

When it comes to workflow automation, Microsoft Power Automate is often the first name that comes to mind. It's powerful, widely adopted, and deeply integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem. But here's the thing: not every workflow happens inside your organization.

What happens when you need to collaborate with clients, share sensitive documents securely, or manage complex handoffs between your team and external stakeholders? That's where the conversation shifts from internal automation to external collaboration. And that's exactly where tools like Moxo come into play.

In this article, we'll break down the core differences between Microsoft Power Automate and Moxo, compare their security, collaboration, and external access features, and help you determine which platform is the right fit for your workflow needs, especially if client handoffs are a priority.

‍

Key takeaways

1. Power Automate excels at internal workflow automation within Microsoft 365 ecosystems, but struggles with external client collaboration
2. Moxo is purpose-built for secure client interactions, external handoffs, and multi-party workflows involving people outside your organization
3. External identity management is a critical gap in Power Automate, making it challenging to securely onboard and manage client access
4. Moxo provides client-specific workspaces with granular permissions, while Power Automate requires workarounds for external collaboration
5. For businesses prioritizing client experience and secure external workflows, Moxo offers specialized features that Power Automate wasn't designed to handle

‍

The core difference: Internal vs. external focus

Before diving into features, it's important to understand the fundamental design philosophy behind each platform.
‍

Moxo: Purpose-built for client interactions

Moxo takes a different approach. It's designed from the ground up for workflows that cross organizational boundaries. Whether you're onboarding a new client, managing a service delivery process, or coordinating with multiple external stakeholders, Moxo provides the infrastructure to do it securely and efficiently.

The platform treats external collaboration as the norm, not an afterthought. Every feature, from identity management to workspace permissions, is built to support secure, compliant interactions with people outside your organization. This fundamental difference in design philosophy shapes everything else about how these tools work.

Microsoft Power Automate: Built for internal efficiency

Power Automate was created to streamline internal business processes. Think of it as the engine that powers automation within your organization. It connects seamlessly with Microsoft 365 apps like Outlook, SharePoint, Teams, and Excel, making it incredibly effective for tasks like:

1. Automating approval workflows within your team
2. Syncing data between internal systems
3. Triggering notifications based on specific events
4. Moving files between SharePoint libraries

For teams already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, Power Automate offers a low-friction way to eliminate repetitive tasks and boost productivity. The problem? It wasn't designed with external collaboration as a primary use case. When you need to bring clients, vendors, or partners into your workflows, things get complicated fast.

‍

Feature comparison: Where they stand

Let's break down how Power Automate and Moxo compare across the features that matter most for client-facing workflows.

Security and compliance

Power Automate:

Power Automate inherits Microsoft's enterprise-grade security infrastructure, which is impressive for internal workflows. You get features like data loss prevention (DLP) policies, Azure Active Directory integration, and compliance with major standards like SOC 2 and GDPR.

However, when it comes to external users, security becomes more complex. Power Automate relies on guest access through Azure AD, which means:

1. External users need to be added as guests to your Azure AD tenant
2. Managing permissions for external users requires IT involvement
3. You have limited control over the client experience
4. Revoking access when a project ends requires manual cleanup

Moxo:

Moxo was built with external security as a priority. The platform offers:

1. Client-specific identity management that doesn't require adding external users to your directory
2. Granular, project-based permissions that you can configure without IT support
3. End-to-end encryption for all communications and file sharing
4. Audit trails specific to each client engagement
5. Automatic access revocation when projects close

For industries that handle sensitive client data, such as financial services, legal, healthcare, or professional services, Moxo's security model better aligns with how client relationships actually work.

Collaboration capabilities

Power automate:

Power Automate's collaboration features are solid for internal teams. You can set up approval chains, send notifications, and trigger workflows based on team activities. But for external collaboration, you're essentially limited to:

1. Sending emails to external stakeholders (one-way communication)
2. Creating forms that external users can fill out
3. Sharing files through SharePoint or OneDrive (requires guest access setup)

Real-time collaboration with clients? That's where things get tricky. You might end up using a patchwork of tools, such as Teams (for meetings), SharePoint (for documents), and email (for everything else). This fragmented approach creates friction and increases the chance of miscommunication.

Moxo:

Moxo provides a unified collaboration hub designed specifically for client interactions. Each client gets a dedicated workspace where you can:

1. Share and co-edit documents in real time
2. Communicate through secure messaging and video calls
3. Track project milestones and deadlines
4. Collect e-signatures and approvals
5. Manage tasks and workflows collaboratively

Everything happens in one place, which means clients don't need to juggle multiple platforms or dig through email chains to find what they need.

External access and identity management

This is where the gap between Power Automate and Moxo becomes most apparent.

Power Automate's external access challenge:

Power Automate doesn't have a native solution for external identity management. When you need to involve clients or external partners, you're forced into one of these scenarios:

1. Guest access: Add external users as guests in Azure AD. This works but creates administrative overhead, security concerns, and a clunky experience for clients who need to switch between their account and yours.
2. Email-based workflows: Rely on email notifications and links. This approach lacks security, doesn't support real-time collaboration, and provides no visibility into whether clients actually completed their tasks.
3. Public forms: Use Power Apps or Forms for data collection. While this works for simple intake scenarios, it's not suitable for ongoing, multi-step client engagements.

None of these options delivers the seamless, secure experience that modern clients expect. You're essentially trying to force an internal tool to do external work.

Moxo's external identity solution:

Moxo solves this problem with a client identity management system designed for external collaboration. Here's how it works:

1. Clients receive secure, unique access credentials for their specific workspace
2. No need to add them to your corporate directory
3. You control exactly what each client can see and do
4. Clients can access their workspace from any device without a complicated setup
5. When a project ends, access automatically expires without orphaned guest accounts

This approach gives you enterprise-grade security without the administrative burden. It also creates a much better experience for clients, who get a professional portal rather than being treated as an "external guest" in your system.

‍

Where Power Automate falls short for client handoffs

Let's talk specifically about client handoffs, because this is where Power Automate's limitations become most evident.

The client onboarding gap

Imagine you've just closed a deal with a new client. You need to collect documentation, complete compliance paperwork, set up access to relevant resources, and establish communication channels. With Power Automate, you'd need to:

1. Send emails requesting documents (hope they don't get lost in spam)
2. Share OneDrive or SharePoint links (after setting up guest access)
3. Schedule a Teams call (send another email with the link)
4. Manually track what's been completed and what's still pending
5. Follow up repeatedly when things slip through the cracks

Moxo handles this scenario with a structured onboarding workflow that lets clients see exactly what's needed, securely upload documents, complete forms, and track progress - all in one place. You get real-time visibility into each client's progress through the process.

The multi-party coordination problem

Many client engagements involve multiple stakeholders. You might have people from your team, the client's team, and even third-party vendors all working together. Power Automate can automate internal handoffs beautifully, but coordinating across organizational boundaries? That's a different story.

Without a central collaboration space, you end up with:

1. Version control issues with documents
2. Confusion about who's responsible for what
3. Delays waiting for email responses
4. Security risks from files being shared through insecure channels

Moxo solves this with workspace-based collaboration where all parties can see the current status, access the latest documents, and communicate in real time. Everyone works from a single source of truth.

The handoff transparency issue

Clients want visibility. They want to know what's happening, what's next, and when they can expect deliverables. Power Automate can send status update emails, but that's a far cry from real transparency.

With Moxo, clients log into their workspace and see:

1. Current project status and upcoming milestones
2. All relevant documents and communications in one place
3. Clear next steps and action items
4. Progress tracking for multi-step processes

This level of transparency reduces the "what's the status?" emails and builds trust through proactive communication.

‍

What users say: G2 reviews

The difference in user experience is clear in G2 reviews.
While Power Automate users praise its internal automation capabilities and Microsoft integration, they frequently mention frustrations with external collaboration.

Common complaints include the complexity of setting up external access, the learning curve for non-technical users, and the challenges of managing workflows that cross organizational boundaries.

Moxo's G2 reviews tell a different story. Users consistently highlight the platform's ease of use for external collaboration, the professional client experience it creates, and the time savings from having everything in one place.

As shared by a G2 reviewer, “Overall, Moxo has been a game-changer for our operations. If your company is looking for a clean, reliable, and all-in-one project management solution that enhances client experience and internal collaboration, we highly recommend Moxo.”

Reviewers particularly appreciate how Moxo makes them look more organized and professional to their clients.

The bottom line from user feedback? Power Automate is excellent at what it was designed for (internal automation), but when it comes to client-facing workflows, Moxo delivers a purpose-built solution that just works better.

‍

How execution differs across the two platforms
‍

‍

When to choose which platform

So which tool should you choose? The answer depends on what kind of workflows you're trying to optimize.

Choose power automate If:

1. Your primary need is to automate internal processes within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem
2. You rarely need to involve external parties in your workflows
3. Your team has IT resources to manage Azure AD and handle complex configurations
4. You're already heavily invested in Microsoft tools and want everything in one ecosystem
5. You need to automate data flows between Microsoft apps

Choose Moxo If:

1. Client interactions and external collaboration are central to your business
2. You need to securely onboard clients and manage complex multi-party workflows
3. You want a professional, branded client experience without the IT overhead
4. Your workflows involve sensitive data that requires granular access control
5. You're in professional services, financial services, legal, healthcare, or another client-centric industry
6. You want to reduce the number of tools clients need to interact with

Or use both

Here's the thing: these tools aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Many organizations use Power Automate for internal efficiency and Moxo for client-facing workflows. Power Automate handles your internal approvals, data synchronisation, and administrative tasks, while Moxo manages everything related to external stakeholders.

This hybrid approach gives you the best of both worlds: automation where you need it internally, and a client-grade experience externally.

‍

The bottom line

Microsoft Power Automate is a powerful automation platform. If you're looking to streamline internal processes within the Microsoft ecosystem, it's tough to beat. But let's be honest: trying to force Power Automate into client-facing scenarios is like using a screwdriver to hammer a nail. It might work eventually, but it's not the right tool for the job.

Moxo was built specifically for the challenges of external collaboration. It understands that client workflows require a different approach - one that prioritizes security without complexity, collaboration without friction, and transparency without overwhelming clients with unnecessary details.

Start your free trial of Moxo today

See why leading professional services firms trust Moxo for secure, seamless client collaboration.

‍

FAQs

Can Power Automate handle external client workflows?

Power Automate can technically support external users through guest access in Azure AD or email-based workflows, but it requires significant setup and doesn't offer the same level of security, collaboration features, or user experience as a platform designed specifically for external workflows like Moxo.

Is Moxo more expensive than Power Automate?

Pricing depends on your specific needs and scale. While Power Automate is included in some Microsoft 365 plans, premium features require additional licensing. Moxo's pricing is based on client-centric workflows. When you factor in the time saved, reduced tool sprawl, and improved client experience, Moxo often delivers better ROI for external collaboration use cases.

Can Moxo integrate with Microsoft tools?

Yes, Moxo offers integrations with popular business tools including Microsoft 365 apps. You can connect Moxo to your existing tech stack while maintaining it as your central hub for client interactions.

How difficult is it to set up external access in Power Automate?

Setting up external access in Power Automate requires IT involvement to configure Azure AD guest access, manage permissions, and maintain security. It's doable but creates ongoing administrative overhead. Moxo simplifies this with built-in external identity management that doesn't require directory integration.

Which platform is better for compliance and security?

Both platforms offer strong security features. Power Automate leverages Microsoft's enterprise security for internal workflows. Moxo provides enterprise-grade security specifically designed for external collaboration, with features like granular permissions, audit trails, and client-specific access controls that are easier to manage for external workflows.

Do I need to choose one or the other?

Not necessarily. Many organizations use Power Automate for internal automation and Moxo for client-facing workflows. This approach lets you leverage the strengths of each platform where they're most effective.

‍