Go-live planning template [Free download]

You've spent months on this implementation. Requirements gathered. System configured. Training completed. UAT signed off.

Now it's go-live week, and suddenly everyone's asking questions that should have been answered weeks ago: Who's responsible for the data cutover? What's the rollback plan if something breaks? Who notifies the client if we need to delay?

This guide breaks down what belongs in a go-live template, how to customize it for your implementation, and the best practices that separate smooth launches from chaotic ones.

‍

Key takeaways

A go-live plan is the execution blueprint, not an afterthought: It brings structure to the transition from testing to production by defining timelines, responsibilities, risks, and required approvals before the pressure peaks.

Templates create consistency across implementations: A reusable go-live planning template captures institutional knowledge and prevents teams from reinventing processes or repeating past mistakes, especially when project leads change.

Ownership clarity prevents launch-week chaos: RACI assignments, approval paths, and decision authorities eliminate the ambiguity that causes missed tasks, stalled escalations, and last-minute surprises during cutover.

Risk planning matters as much as readiness: Documented rollback procedures, known issue lists, and contingency triggers ensure teams can respond quickly when something goes wrong instead of improvising under stress.

‍

What is a go-live plan

A go-live plan is the final execution phase of any implementation, the structured roadmap that coordinates your transition from "we've built this" to "people are using this in production."

Go-live plan refers to your overall strategy: timeline, stakeholder coordination, risk mitigation, and success criteria. The go-live checklist is the tactical task list for execution day, hour-by-hour activities, and verification steps.

The cutover plan is the technical subset focused on transitioning from the legacy system to the new one: data migration, system deactivation, and production activation.

You need all three. But the go-live plan is the umbrella that holds them together, whether you're rolling out an ERP system, launching a client onboarding workflow, or implementing new software with an external vendor.

Moxo's workflow builder helps teams visualize and automate these interconnected processes, turning static planning documents into trackable workflows where every handoff triggers the next step automatically.

‍

Why you need a structured go-live template

The pain is familiar: dependencies get missed because someone assumed the integration was ready. Ownership gets fuzzy when three people thought someone else was handling client communication. Escalation paths don't exist, so an issue surfaces at 2 PM, and no one knows who makes the call to delay.

Consistency across implementations means you're not reinventing the wheel every time. The template captures institutional knowledge, so even first-time project leads have guardrails to follow.

Clear accountability eliminates the finger-pointing that derails launches. Every task has an owner. Every deadline is documented. No one can claim confusion about who was responsible when something slips.

Built-in risk mitigation ensures contingency plans exist before you need them. Rollback procedures are documented, not improvised under pressure.

Peninsula Visa transformed its implementation processes using Moxo's automated workflows, cutting turnaround time by 93% by digitizing intake, document uploads, and approval steps end-to-end. The structured approach eliminated the manual coordination that previously caused delays.

‍

Key components of an effective go-live template

Readiness assessment criteria

Without a formal go/no-go framework, teams launch systems that aren't ready, or delay launches that could proceed.

The readiness assessment is your checkpoint: completed UAT with documented sign-off, data migration verification, integration testing results, training completion records, and stakeholder approvals from both technical and business leads.

Readiness isn't binary. Define your thresholds: which known issues can proceed with workarounds, and which are hard blockers requiring delay. Microsoft's Dynamics 365 guidance puts it plainly: skipping this step risks "delays or difficulties in go-live migration, inaccurate or corrupted data, and reduced user and customer confidence."

Moxo's approvals engine routes these decisions to the right stakeholders with automated reminders, ensuring sign-offs happen on schedule rather than getting lost in email threads.

‍

Roles and responsibilities (RACI)

Ambiguity during go-live creates delays and blame-shifting. Every task needs an owner, not a team, a person. Define key roles: project lead, technical lead, communications owner, support lead, executive sponsor.

For vendor implementations, clarify which tasks fall to them versus your internal team.

Falconi Consulting faced this challenge during its pandemic pivot to remote work.

By implementing Moxo's role-based workflows for multi-stakeholder approvals, they reduced turnaround times by 40%, and everyone knew exactly what they owned and when action was required.

‍

Communication and risk management

The communication breakdown during go-live typically happens in two places: internal teams lose track of status updates, and external stakeholders feel left in the dark.

Pre-write templates for common scenarios, status updates, issue alerts, delay notifications, so you're not crafting messaging under pressure.

Risk registers should identify potential failure points before they happen. Document rollback procedures and backout steps. Define trigger conditions: at what point do you invoke the contingency plan, and who makes that call?

With Moxo's client portal, both internal teams and external stakeholders see progress in real-time without chasing updates. Automated notifications alert the right people when steps stall or SLAs approach, no manual follow-up required.

‍

Go-live planning best practices

Schedule for low-risk windows. Avoid Fridays, if issues arise, support resources disappear for the weekend. Avoid month-end, quarter-close, and holidays. Mid-week launches give you runway to address problems before stakeholder patience runs thin.

Hold a go/no-go meeting 24–72 hours before launch. This formal checkpoint is where stakeholders review readiness criteria and collectively decide to proceed or delay. Shared accountability matters more than any single person's confidence.

Document known issues honestly. Stakeholders should have realistic expectations about what's shipping. Surprises during go-live erode trust faster than acknowledged limitations ever could.

Plan for hypercare. Go-live isn't the finish line. Define a support window, typically one to two weeks, where the implementation team remains available to address issues before transitioning to standard support.

BNP Paribas applied these principles when restructuring their client onboarding process, implementing systematic workflows through Moxo that cut onboarding time by 50% while improving client satisfaction scores across the board.

‍

How Moxo streamlines go-live execution

Static templates get you organized. But when go-live day arrives, and tasks start moving fast, spreadsheets and shared documents can't keep pace. The gap between planning and execution is where implementations fail, and where workflow orchestration makes the difference.

From static plans to live workflows. Moxo's workflow builder transforms your go-live template into an executable process. Map out every phase using drag-and-drop tools, readiness checkpoints, stakeholder approvals, communication triggers, and contingency branches. Each step connects to the next, so completing one task automatically activates the next person's responsibility. No one has to wonder what happens next or chase colleagues to confirm handoffs.

Real-time visibility for all stakeholders. Go-live involves internal teams, external vendors, and often clients who need to know what's happening without flooding your inbox with status requests. Moxo's client portal gives every stakeholder a view tailored to their role. Project leads see the full workflow. Executives see milestone status. Clients see what they need to act on.  

As one G2 reviewer described their pre-Moxo state: "Before we implemented it, we had to rely on a number of manual steps and scattered tools to get new partners onboarded, which was both time-consuming and prone to bottlenecks." That's the exact chaos a structured go-live workflow eliminates.

Automated reminders replace manual chasing. The hours before go-live shouldn't be spent sending reminder emails about outstanding tasks. Moxo intelligent alerts handle this systematically, nudges go out when deadlines approach, escalations trigger when tasks are overdue, and stakeholders receive alerts the moment something requires their attention.  

Audit trails for post-launch review. After go-live, you'll want to understand what happened and when, both for compliance and for improving future implementations. Moxo logs every action automatically: who completed which task, when approvals were granted, and what communications occurred. This audit trail becomes invaluable during post-mortems and essential for regulated industries where documentation isn't optional.

The pattern across Moxo customers is consistent: when go-live coordination moves from scattered documents and email chains into a structured workflow, implementations move faster and fail less often.

Get started with Moxo to turn your next go-live plan into an orchestrated process with built-in accountability.

‍

Conclusion

A go-live template isn't about creating more paperwork—it's about creating confidence. The difference between smooth launches and chaotic ones comes down to preparation, clear ownership, and real-time visibility into what's happening and what's stalled. When these elements align, implementations succeed. When they don't, even technically sound systems fail at the finish line.

Moxo transforms static go-live plans into orchestrated workflows where every task has an owner, every deadline triggers alerts, and every stakeholder sees progress without chasing updates. Teams using Moxo for implementations report 40–60% faster approvals and 75% reduction in implementation time.

Get started with Moxo to orchestrate your next go-live from preparation through post-launch support.

‍

FAQs on go-live planning templates

What is a go-live plan?

A go-live plan is a structured roadmap outlining tasks, owners, timelines, communication steps, and rollback procedures needed to move a system into production. Teams use platforms like Moxo Workflows to automate these steps and maintain visibility across stakeholders.

What should be included in a go-live checklist?

A go-live checklist should include readiness criteria, data validation, stakeholder approvals, communication milestones, RACI ownership, and hypercare plans. Moxo’s workflow builder turns these items into automated, trackable workflows that eliminate missed steps.

When should go-live planning start?

Planning should begin during UAT, allowing time for rehearsals, risk mitigation, and communication prep. With Moxo’s implementation workflows, teams can structure this planning early and automate reminders as deadlines approach.

What is a go/no-go meeting?

A go/no-go meeting is a formal checkpoint where stakeholders review readiness evidence before approving launch. Moxo audit trails document approvals, timestamps, and decisions for compliance and post-launch reviews.

‍

‍